psychology-health

At first glance, a utilitarian approach would appear to be the most logical decision making process for when considering sex; especially if religion was not a part of one’s childhood. However, the utilitarian way of thinking is not necessarily relevant to a single instance of deciding whether or not to engage in sexual activity, because it pertains to a way of thinking which is generalized.

 Similarly, rationalization is not the best avenue of thought for making decisions about entering into a sexual encounter. Consider the heat of the moment; two people are sharing a passionate kiss, nobody else is nearby, and the circumstances are perfect for a sexual interlude. Without complete disregard for common sense and safety, being rational would not be foremost in most peoples’ minds at that time; how many people stop to analyze anything at that moment?  Emotions and rationalization do not usually co-exist. 

Although “opponents of ethical relativism argue that allowing people free rein to determine what is right or wrong may bring about social chaos and decay” (Rathus, Nevid & Fichner-Rathus, 2005), situational ethics and ethical relativism are free range methods of thinking which allow for a decision to be made based on the circumstances at a given time. Either system would allow me to make choices which are based on my own values and opinion and for a particular situation, rather than having to choose from a limited set of options which may be governed by someone else’s’ moral code.  Those who argue against either of these systems are doing so based on subjective opinions which are not necessarily the same as mine. Despite having certain values or religious beliefs, it is not always possible for anyone to make such an important decision about a sexual situation prior to the specific event taking place. Even those with the strictest religious upbringing have been known to make decisions on the spur of the moment, which they would not agree with in the course of a simple conversation. Reference Rathus, S.A., Nevid, J.S., and Fichner-Rathus, L. (2005). Human sexuality in a world of diversity. (6th ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS